featured articles READ ABOUT US subscribe click here for home page about us
Entranced by Nudibranchs
Hal Hughes
On the Morro Bay Waterfront
   Reinventing a Local Fishery
Rasa Gustaitis
Ocean Floor Mapping
Anne Canright
Derelict Gear
Kirsten Gilardi
The Costs of Sand Mining
   When Beaches Disappear,
   Who Benefits, Who Pays?
Orville T. Magoon
Linda K. Lent
Ebb & Flow
  Sam's Page
    Are We Ready in the Delta?
  Coastal Conservancy News
Coastal Viewpoint

  Ocean Love and Learning

Our Gallery
  Poems
  Photographs
Other Publications
  Useful Sources
coastal conservancy home back issues links our gallery contact us
banner graphic
 

| home | print page | email to a friend |

The Costs of Sand Mining
When Beaches Disappear, Who Benefits, Who Pays?

CLICK TO VIEW ALL CARTOONS As if the constant attack on coastlines by storms, waves, and currents were not doing damage enough, the “works of man” have greatly exacerbated coastal erosion, in both the short and the long term. And often the most damaging activities take place far from the ocean.

Our preliminary research, surprisingly, tells us that the primary cause of sediment removal from beaches is not dams but sand and gravel mining. Dams are the second major cause. Sand mining along the beaches of California and Oregon began in the late 1800s. Although it had been outlawed by 1991, substantial legal mining still goes on in coastal watersheds and even a stretch of coastal dunes near Monterey. Overall in northern California, from the Russian River to the Oregon border, some 11 million tons of sand and gravel are removed each year. That figure pales in comparison with southern California, where an annual average of 55.8 million tons is extracted, mostly around Los Angeles and San Diego, though wherever there is major construction of roads and buildings, there is usually a mine nearby.

All this extraction affects the shoreline. Even off-stream gravel mining is detrimental to beaches. Floodplain mining creates large pits next to dynamically changing river channels. If these pits are flooded during peak flows, they act as sinks for sediment. The normal transportation of sediment helps to dissipate a river system’s energy. When sand and gravel are removed from within the channel, “hungry water,” deprived of its natural sediment content, creates a disequilibrium that can cause erosion of gravel bars downstream.

The second major cause of sediment removal is damming. More than 500 dams impound rivers and streams in California, affecting 38 percent of the coastal watershed (some 16,000 square miles). The dams reduce the average annual sand and gravel flow by 2.8 million cubic meters (enough to fill 1,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools) or 25 percent of normal, according to Cope Willis and Gary Griggs in the Journal of Geology (June 2004).

There are also a few minor culprits: “debris basins,” built to trap sediments during floods; seawalls or coastal armoring, which can have major local impacts; dredged navigation channels, where material is taken offshore out of the nearby littoral system, as happens in Humboldt Bay and the Columbia River estuary; and subsidence, both natural and human-induced.

 

  home  | 1 | 2 | 3 | >>  
Send Feedback and Back to Top back to top send feedback

 

bottom navigation site map contact us privacy policy terms of use submission guidelines subscribe index past issues conservancy site

Copyright 2005 © California Coastal Conservancy All Rights Reserved.